You don’t have to do anything to not offer a license. Neither site terms nor jurisdiction-specific copyright limitations are sufficient for the kinds of collaboration that people usually seek on a public code host, such as experimentation, modification, and sharing as fostered by an open source license. Others may not need your permission if limitations and exceptions to copyright apply to their particular situation. For example, if you publish your source code in a public repository on GitHub, you have accepted the Terms of Service, by which you allow others to view and fork your repository. Once the work has other contributors (each a copyright holder), “nobody” starts including you.Įven in the absence of a license file, you may grant some rights in cases where you publish your source code to a site that requires accepting terms of service. Unless you include a license that specifies otherwise, nobody else can copy, distribute, or modify your work without being at risk of take-downs, shake-downs, or litigation. When you make a creative work (which includes code), the work is under exclusive copyright by default.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |